CFHI at NAFSA Conference 2012 - Houston, Texas
Arntson is a community organizer, faculty member and co-founder of the
Paul touched on paradoxes central to community development and global health education alike. Highlighting several here:
- How do we run global health and other micro-development projects when the macro-development and global inequity issues seem so overwhelming?
- How do we release our students from being ‘prisoners of perfection’ (and thus focusing on what is wrong)?
- How do we minimize direct service and maximize capacity-building when the expectations in country (and often those of students and sending institutions) are so skewed in the opposite direction?
overwhelming poverty, disparities, and geopolitical challenges may serve to disillusion rather than inspire students. To counteract this effect it is important to remind students that global engagement is a stepping stone process.
Approaching Global Health – An Asset-Based Model
The structure of some global health education programs (especially those with service-oriented mentality or health/humanitarian interventions) also risk giving students the impression that western-centric involvement is the solution to local global health challenges. Consequently students can become paternalistic and neocolonial in their approach to global health projects. To avoid this undesirable outcome, programs need to be conscientious of their approach with global communities and how to frame student’s roles and responsibilities.
Asset-based engagement, modeled after the
Maximizing Capacity Building
The question of how to minimize direct service and maximize capacity building is a challenging one. Many colleagues in global health ‘get’ this distinction, but unfortunately as a community we still gravitate toward short-term outputs and pre-empted project designs. Each year I advise students on crafting global health proposals. Yet never once has project application required the student to outline what they WILL NOT be doing when they go abroad. Universally, applications, grants, and proposals ask students and faculty to describe project methods and desired outcomes, often before they’ve ever set foot in the community. As global health matures, I look forward to proposals which require Westerners to describe how they will hold back when they arrive in a new community--how they will listen, learn, and take stock of the strengths that lurk around every tattered corner. Ultimately - how will students enable populations to build on their own strengths to create sustainable improvements and capable communities?
In the meantime, students and faculty who want to focus on long-term capacity building, community empowerment, and building effective global health leadership can participate in programs with established organizations such as CFHI who are providing ongoing asset-based engagement.